Diddy intends to disregard several of the insurance claims in accuser Joi Dickerson-Neal’s sexual offense legal action versus the hip-hop magnate.
Diddy Looks For Termination of Some Cases in Sexual Offense Lawsuit
According to papers gotten by XXL, Diddy’s lawyers submitted a movement on Friday (April 26) in New york city court asking a court to disregard several of the insurance claims versus the Bad Kid Enjoyment creator in Joi Dickerson-Neal’s sexual offense legal action. In the papers, Diddy’s lawyers compete that Dickerson-Neal’s insurance claims of retribution pornography and human trafficking ought to be disregarded with bias due to the fact that those criminal laws were neither passed neither around at the time of the supposed sexual offense in 1991.
Diddy’s lawyers kept in mind that Dickerson-Neal’s insurance claim of human trafficking under the New york city Solutions for Targets of Human Trafficking Legislation is not suitable in this situation due to the fact that the regulation just entered into impact in 2007, which is 16 years after the supposed attack in between Diddy and Dickerson-Neal occurred.
In Dickerson-Neal’s insurance claim of supposed retribution pornography versus Diddy under the New York City City Vengeance Pornography Legislation, the songs magnate’s lawyer compete that regulation ended up being efficient in December of 2017, which was 26 years after the supposed sexual offense. For that reason, it does not use in this situation.
” As a law can not relate to carry out taking place prior to it existed, a complainant can not take legal action against an entity for conduct that supposedly occurred prior to it existed,”
Diddy’s legal representatives specified.
Diddy’s lawyers likewise said that Dickerson-Neal can not take legal action against Negative Kid Enjoyment or Combs Enjoyment, that are noted as offenders in her legal action, due to the fact that both business really did not exist at the time of the supposed sexual offense.
Diddy, His Business Struck With Sexual Offense Lawsuit
In November of 2023, Joi Dickerson-Neal submitted a suit versus Diddy asserting he sexually attacked her and taped the attack without her understanding when she was a 19-year-old university student in 1991.
In her 22-page civil match, Dickerson-Neal affirms that she mosted likely to supper with Diddy at a dining establishment in Harlem, N.Y., and he “purposefully drugged” her, which left her incapacitated. She asserts that Diddy drove her to a location he was remaining at and sexually attacked her.
Dickerson-Neal affirms that, without her understanding, Diddy taped and distributed a video clip catching the sexual offense occurrence amongst different partners within the songs sector.
Diddy has actually given that refuted the accusations and implicated Joi Dickerson-Neal of manipulating the New york city regulation to link business that did not exist.
